Now, let’s start writing sentences that are logically corrupt.
I knew about Flipper Zero long before it became widely known. Inherently, there’s no good or evil in this world. There’s only fun or not fun, that’s all there should be.
But, there are people in this world who are crazy in a good way. They are obsessed with the madness of good, and vice versa.
For example, there’s a gadget for computer geeks called Flipper Zero. You can buy it for less than $400. It’s originally just a toy for geeks, and it should all be about whether it’s fun or not.
However, there are also people in the world who are obsessed with the madness of evil, and some of them misuse Flipper Zero. With Flipper Zero, you can even tamper with meters.
Again, Flipper Zero was originally just a toy for computer geeks, and it wasn’t intended to be misused. But, it’s a fact that there are people who misuse it.
If this gadget, which can be bought for less than $400, is misused, it will be a serious situation. I know that, so even if I’m interested and don’t intend to misuse it, I’ll never buy it.
That’s because the more industrial products are consumed, the lower their prices become, and I don’t want to be a part of that.
I tell people I trust that “we have to do something about this.” But, I don’t show them the real thing, buy it, or introduce them to websites where they can buy it.
Because of this, I’m sometimes seen as if I’m delusional, like I have schizophrenia. People with schizophrenia may complain of delusions such as “bad things are being written about me on social media,” but because it’s a delusion, they fall into a situation where they “can’t actually show it."
I also have the commonality of “not being able to show it” because I intentionally don’t show it, and I’m mistaken for having delusions. It’s a combination of that and my desire to stop the misuse.
If I were to choose the madness of good, I would literally choose good. If I need to play the villain to do that, I will play the villain even if it means sacrificing myself.
Originally, there is no good or evil in this world, and that may mean the ambiguity of the boundary line. The word hacking originated at MIT. Even if I were a hacker, I would never be a cracker.
Therefore, if we assume that the results are the same, the difference in direction is meaningless, that’s my standard. It’s just acting evil for the madness of good.
“Sometimes I think about it this way. This is just an example. I run a safe deposit box business. Due to the nature of safe deposit boxes, I don’t inspect what customers deposit.
Customers might be storing large sums of money, love letters, or even using the safe deposit box to hide illegal drugs.
I don’t know if I should inspect what customers deposit, even considering illegal drugs and such, but I don’t."
What is ethics?
What can you take from a sentence that seems like “Association Loosening”?